Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
HFAlex

Switchbalde

Recommended Posts

Premetto che ho usato la funzione cerca de forum , ma non ho trovato nulla.

switchblade11.jpg

switchbladeplan.gif

popsciswitch.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ragazzi ma di questi disegni di concetto ce ne sono a migliaia... non avete idea di quanta roba è girata prima che apparissero B-2 ed F-22...

e anche prima!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Illustration by John MacNeill, used with permission.

 

The USAF have been testing the X-29 for two decades now, this very unusual looking aircraft has a pair of forward sweapt wings (FSW).

 

These wings gave the aircraft amazing maneuverability, no other aircraft can make tighter turns than the X-29.

The X-29 was tested from 1984 to 1992 in a joint NASA, DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) and U.S. Air Force Program, and made a total of 374 combined flights.

 

 

Reverse airflow-forward-swept wing vs aft swept wing. On the forward-swept wing, ailerons remained unstalled at high angles of attack because the air over the forward swept wing tended to flow inward toward the root of the wing rather than outward toward the wing tip as on an aft-swept wing. This provided better airflow over the ailerons and prevented stalling (loss of lift) at high angles of attack.

 

DARPA and NASA have invested millions of dollars on the program, yet not a single official US fighter aircraft uses the FSW design...but in the black world there is one: The Switchblade!

 

Unfortunatly there isn´t any official information about the switchblade fighter, even FAS.org hasn´t got any information about this craft...

 

This article is from populairmechanics.com:

 

Revealed: The Switchblade

By Steve Douglass

 

Popular Science front coverOn moonless nights a secret aircraft taxies out of a remote hangar complex located on the northeast corner of an Air Force base in Nevada. The security lights on the base are dimmed as the aircraft rolls out onto the active runway. Under cover of darkness the aircraft officially called the "Bird of Prey" (but nicknamed by pilots the "Switchblade") takes off on a training mission into the sprawling Nellis Bombing Range.

 

As far back as 1989 the buzz inside aviation circles was the Pentagon was developing a variable swing-wing aircraft to replace the aging fleet of F-111s which was retired for good in 1995. The F-111 was a medium sized bomber also capable of defending itself as a fighter and then speeding away at over 1600 miles per hour.

 

When reports of a new swing wing aircraft sighted near Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico and at Langley Air Force Base, Virginia, surfaced Popular Science investigated. High ranking officials are said to have gathered in secure hangers at two air bases to be given a sneak peek at the new aircraft. In September of 1994, it was observed circling high over Amarillo, Texas, for several minutes at midday. These reports to an exclusive story on this aircraft in 1995.

 

New Evidence

 

Since then Popular Science has learned that the aircraft is not a standard variable swing-wing aircraft as first reported but instead employs a unique forward sweeping wing mechanism that enables the aircraft to become an advanced attack aircraft capable of precision weapons delivery, super maneuverability (for air combat) and MACH 3 dash capability.

Bombing setupFighting SetupHigh Speed Setup

Illustration by John MacNeill, used with permission.

 

A new covert squadron was formed to fly these aircraft. Recently Popular Science obtained from aviation author and historian Jim Goodall the squadron patch worn by pilots that fly the supersecret Switchblade and very recently Northrop filled patents with the U.S. Patent Office, including descriptions and drawings of an advanced tactical fighter/bomber that could very well be the mystery aircraft.

 

Forward Thinking Design Has Roots in the Past

 

In the mid 1980s Grumman, in conjunction with DARPA, NASA and the USAF, created an unorthodoxed looking and flying aircraft the X-29.

The purpose of the X-29 project was to explore the super maneuverability of an aircraft designed with forward-swept wing.

 

An aircraft with a forward-swept wing (FSW) is very unstable and thus highly maneuverable but as pre-computer age designers found out also almost humanly impossible to control. But when a digital fly-by-wire flight control system is paired with onboard high speed computers, fly by wire digital control system, super-responsive wing actuators and flexible composite material wings, the result is a FSW aircraft can fly rings around anything in the sky including most modern fighters. Once controllable, forward swept wings have many advantages over conventional wings including, lower drag and lower stall speeds, super manueverbility as well as excellent control and roll response within high angles of attack.

 

The X-29 flew successfully for many years proving that not only was a FSW aircraft feasible but the design could also lead to future fighters with outstanding dogfighting and missile avoiding capabilities limited only by the pilot's tolerance to high G forces.

 

It is interesting to note that as much of a success the Grumman X-29 program was deemed to be, no currently acknowledged U.S. fighter is designed with a forward-swept wing including current advanced designs like the F-22 or the Joint Strike Fighter. Other countries however have realized the potential of the design and have built FSW aircraft such as Russia's SU-37.

 

Although an FSW aircraft could prove to be a potent fighter design, as an attack aircraft it has some major drawbacks. Foremost among them for accurate pinpoint bombing accuracy a stable platform is a must.

 

An FSW aircraft was designed just to be the opposite of stable, however if you could design an aircraft that could go from a stable configuration to an unstable one at the flick of a switch, then you would have a very desirable tactical attack aircraft. If it could also be made stealthy and given the ability to fly very fast,(above MACH 3) you would have a military planner's dream aircraft. This is what the Northrop design (U.S. patent No. 5,984,231) embodies.

 

The Northrop design (U.S. patent No. 5,984,231):

The Northrop design (U.S. patent No. 5,984,231)

 

Officially the Air Force does not have a replacement for the F-111 medium fighter/bomber but it is also a fact that in the Air Force's fifty plus years history it has never abandoned a aircraft mission type such as that of the medium bomber. Currently the USAF has three heavy bombers, the B-1B, B2 and B-52 and one small bomber, the F-117A (which can only carry two conventional bombs) unless you count the F-15E which is an 1970s era fighter adapted to fill a tactical bombing role. There is no white-world aircraft that comes close to duplicating the versatility and medium sized bomb load of the retired F-111 Aardvark.

 

Any F-111 aircraft follow-on had to be able to meet all the future tactical needs of the US armed forces including precision weapons delivery, air combat superiority, long range, low radar signature and high speed ingress and egress from the target area. To design an aircraft that is all things to all people is a considerable challenge. One aviation engineer likened it to "building an Indy racer that can climb rocky hills, haul two tons of cargo and still out race all the police cars sent to chase it."

 

Multi-mission aircraft of the past have invariably had to make design sacrifices in one area or another, never really coming close to becoming true flying Swiss Army knives. The Northrop design meets all the design criteria for an advanced multi-regime tactical bomber/fighter aircraft.

 

With the wings fully swept aft the aircraft can slow to drop precision weapons or land on short unimproved runways. Swept forward twenty degrees and the aircraft becomes a highly agile air combat platform. Sweep the wings fully forward and they become flush with the aircraft with the trailing edge becoming the leading edge, forming a highly swept 75 degree stealthy delta perfect for high speed getaways! Or as it is understated in the U.S. Patent 5,984231 abstract "The aforementioned apparatus may be used in a method to configure the aircraft for the desire flight regime." thus becoming the aircraft for every mission.

 

Northrop and Grumman have considerable expertise in designing advanced aircraft. Northrop was the chief contractor on the B-2 stealth bomber, YF-23 and the recently declassified Tacit Blue. Grumman has considerable experience in forward swept wing aircraft design as well as having built and designed the Navy's premier variable-swept winged aircraft, the F-14 Tomcat.

 

In hind sight, since both companies are now one, the merger of each company's unique design expertise into one advanced aircraft now seems inevitable. Could both of the dead-end YF-23 and X-29 technology research projects been white world covers for a black world project? Officially the YF-23 and X-29 projects led to dead ends, but together they may have yielded a military aircraft of exceptional capabilities.

 

But is this the aircraft referred to as the "Bird of Prey" on the secret squadron's patch? Look at the sword on the patch closely and compare it to the top view of the Northrop Patent 5,984,231 See any resemblance?

 

Rumbles from inside the Pentagon say the aircraft is now undergoing declassification review. Like the super secret F-117 before it, one day the Switchblade might fly above us in broad daylight or become the darling of military airshows, but until then it flies only at night also shrouded in the virtual darkness of the black world.

 

UPDATE: Since this article was first published the "Bird Of Prey" has retreated back into the black world. Even the secret facility at Nellis has been reported as now being abandoned. The Bird of Prey insignia and "Det 30" that was painted on the entrance to these set of hangars on the northeast side of the main Nellis runway has dissapeared. When and if this aircraft is to be revealed is anyone's guess.

 

-Steve Douglass www.popsci.com

 

NEW UPDATE (Jan 2003):

ST. LOUIS, October 18, 2002 - Boeing unveiled the "Bird of Prey," a technology demonstrator that pioneered breakthrough low-observable technologies and revolutionized aircraft design, development and production.

The once highly classified project ran from 1992 through 1999, and was revealed because the technologies and capabilities developed have become industry standards, and it is no longer necessary to conceal the aircraft's existence.

 

The name Bird Of Pray belongs to THIS aircraft, the Boeing Bird Of Pray.

The switchblade remains a top secret project...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... PER PLUTONE ... :( !!! Per quanto mi appaia strano, devo confessare che il design di questi ultimi velivoli (anche nel caso in cui si tratti di semplici lavori "di concetto" come sono stati giustamente definiti) NON mi aggrada ... continuo a restare affascinato dalle forme di qualche 30 o 20 anni fa ... molto più "ardite" e stupefacenti per l'epoca (a mio avviso) di quanto non risultino queste ... che stia diventando vecchio ??? :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No JA37, non stai diventando vecchio, perchè 20 anni fa, le linee degli aerei venivano disegnate dal vento, oggi vengono disegnate in funzione della tecnologia Stealth, che li fa sembrare aerei da "cartoni animati", te li ricordi quelli giapponesi di quell'epoca?

 

Non c'è storia, le linee sinuose dettate dalle leggi aerodinamiche sono insuperabili per bellezza.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A questo proposito, ricordo che ai miei tempi il massimo dell'estetica era rappresentato dal Phantom II, che con i suoi piani di coda negativi, l'ala quasi a delta con le estremità "all'insù", i missili Sparrow semiannegati in fusoliera e il cannone in semi-gondola sotto il muso sembrava uscito dalla fantascienza.

 

Poi quando spiccò il primo volo l'F-15... le sue linee veramente perfette ne fecero il caccia bellissimo per eccellenza e ancora oggi la sua configurazione generale ispira non poco progetti come l' F-22 e l'F-35.

 

Falcon e Hornet completarono l'opera, con linee che apparivano disegnate da uno stilista di fantascienza.

 

Persino l'F-14, il più "tranquillo" della serie, era stupendo: quel muso che si protendeva tra le prese d'aria che sembravano sinuose scapole di una bellissima donna, le prese in gondola con quella conformazione così anti-convenzionale, i piloni subalari di disegno innovativo...

 

Oggi, onestamente, non c'è nulla che mi faccia provare le sensazioni di quei tempi.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Grazie Legolas e Gianni065 :) ... mi consolate davvero :okok: e concordo ... le sensazioni da voi descritte a me venivano (e vengono) infuse dal mio "omonimo" :lol: col suo unico delta canard o doppio delta che dir si voglia e dalle bizzarre forme del suo predecessore Draken ... ho sempre adorato ed adoro i manga con "robottoni" ed astronavi ma certi profili e geometrie "stanno bene lì" ... come è stato sottolineato ... e poi credo che un tempo "ci si stupisse" davvero in modo genuino di fronte a quello che sapeva di "fantascienza vera" ... Credo che stia avvenendo qualcosa di simile anche in altri ambiti, vedi il cinema basato in modo particolare sulla spettacolarità: c'è ancora qualcuno che si stupisce se un "Sci Fi" o un "action" movie è caratterizzato da "effetti speciali" particolarmente curati ....? Ormai è diventato uno "standard", anzi si resta delusi qualora essi non risultino brillanti ... ehehe cmq rinnovo l'avviso ... iniziamo a parlare come "i vecchietti che rimpiangono i bei vecchi tempi" ... :P attenzione .... ehehe !!!!

CIAO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

la linea non è delle più belle, ma abbastanza accattivante.

cmq non eistono più i bei aerei di una volta, anke se la nuova generazione di caccia europei è molto bella..........molto meglio del cugino di mazinga a inizio pagina.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

veramente credo che sia avvenuto il contrario, il regista del film si è ispirato dal switchbalde

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
veramente credo che sia avvenuto il contrario, il regista del film si è ispirato dal switchbalde

Si, intendevo proprio questo. Mi sarò spiegato male.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...